Skip to the content
Skip to Content
Libraries Indiana University Bloomington

Main navigation

  • Finding
    & Borrowing
  • Researching
    & Teaching
  • Visiting
    & Studying
  • News
    & Events
  • About Us
  • Need Help?
  • IUCAT
Blogs
  • Topics
    • Archives of Traditional Music
    • Collections
    • Craig Preservation Lab
    • Discovery & User Experience
    • IUB Archives
    • Lilly Library
    • Media Beat
    • MDPI
    • Moving Image Archive
    • Research Data Services
    • Scholarly Communication
    • Wylie House
  • All Posts
  1. Home
  2. Posts
  3. Metadata Discussion Group
  4. OCLC research report: Social Metadata for LAMs

Find a blog post

Recent Posts In Metadata Discussion Group
  • Inclusivity and Bias in Metadata Research Intern Report
  • Summary of May 7 Libraries In-house Institute session
  • Summary of April 25 Bias in Metadata Discussion
  • Summary of March 22 Facts in Metadata Discussion
  • Round Robin Updates – March 2016 meeting summary
Metadata Discussion Group
  • Contact Form
  • Facebook icon
  • Twitter icon
  • Instagram icon
Metadata Discussion Group

OCLC research report: Social Metadata for LAMs

December 19, 2011 | Jennifer A. Liss

OCLC has released part two (of three) of the research report, Social Metadata for Libraries, Archives and Museums. Part I: Site Reviews was released in September. Part II: Survey Analysis was released this month.

How respondents use social networking content for describing assets or collections

If you don’t have time to read the whole 73-page report, the Overview and Trends and Themes are worth a look. A few findings that jumped out at me:

  • Sites are increasingly multi-media; although still images and text predominate among the responding sites, more than a third also offer moving images and audio. Archives are a predominant source of content.
  • More than half of the survey respondents use a controlled vocabulary on their sites.
  • Only half of respondents indicated that they show users tags already in the system. A third combine user-contributed tags with their own controlled terms.
  • Most respondents index user-supplied metadata; most user-supplied content is searchable. More than half correct existing metadata as the result of user contributions. However, a minority incorporates metadata into their own description workflows and incorporates user-contributed content into their own sites.
  • A number of respondents are integrating their sites into institution’s production services rather than being dependent on external or temporary funding sources.
  • Usability testing tends to be done later in a site’s life cycle rather than as part of the development stage.
Tags: controlled vocabularies, Metadata in the News, OCLC, user-contributed metadata

Post navigation

(#11) FAR and IUScholarWorks
The Big Apple Comes to Blooming-town : Part II

Social media

  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • RSS

Additional resources

Featured Databases

  • OneSearch@IU
  • Google Scholar
  • JSTOR
  • WorldCat
  • Nexis Uni
  • HathiTrust Digital Library
Databases A-Z

IU Libraries

  • Spaces
  • Our Team
  • Our Departments
  • Contact Us
  • Intranet SharePoint (Staff)
  • Login (Blogs admin)
Give Now
  • Accessibility
  • College Scorecard
  • Open to All
  • Privacy Notice
  • Copyright © 2026 The Trustees of Indiana University