IU

Indiana University Bloomington IU Bloomington IU Bloomington

Metadata Discussion Group data nerdery in the service of resource discoveryIndiana University Bloomington Libraries Homepage

homepage for Metadata Discussion Group
  • Home
  • Meetings
  • Listserv
  • Archive
  • About
  • Contact
Skip to content

Summary of the March Meeting: Metadata for Archival Materials

Posted on March 15, 2013 by Jennifer A. Liss

The topic for the month of March was metadata for archival materials, specifically, the updates to the DACS and EAD standards, the adoption of a new standard, EAC-CPF, and the near completion of a new application for curating and publishing archival metadata, ArchivesSpace. The list of recommended resources for this meeting was previously posted.

The discussion opened with musings regarding EAC-CPF Continue reading “Summary of the March Meeting: Metadata for Archival Materials”

Posted on March 15, 2013 by Author Jennifer A. Liss Posted in Categories Meeting Notes | Tagged: Tags archives metadata, ArchivesSpace, DACS, EAC-CPF, EAD

Drink up: archival metadata curation as a bottling factory

Posted on March 4, 2013 by Jennifer A. Liss

To get myself geared up for tomorrow’s meeting about archives metadata, I re-read Mary Elings and Günter Waibel’s article, “Metadata for All: Descriptive Standards and Metadata Sharing across Libraries, Archives and Museums.”1 In the article, the authors liken metadata creation and curation to the beverage bottling industry. Elings and Waibel’s article was one of the first this group discussed. It’s well worth another read.

Before consumption by the thirsty masses, beverages must be funneled into bottles, packaged up, and shipped off to market. Similarly, metadata must be formulated, structured, and packaged before it can be shared, searched, and displayed. I hope the authors of the “Metadata for all” article will not mind that I have sketched an expanded version of their metadata chart to accompany our discussion of metadata standards and tools for managing archival materials.

Assortment of antique bottles
All Bottled Up by Professor Bop (Flickr)

In the Elings and Waibel metaphor, bottles represent the metadata schemas we use. In order for machines to manipulate data for search and browse indexing and display, metadata has to be structured. Metadata schemas, like Encoded Archival Description (EAD), act like containers or bottles for metadata, thereby providing the needed structure. Schemas like EAD are referred to as data structure standards.

If standards such as EAD (or MODS or Dublin Core) are bottles, then standards that are used to formulate how contents flow into bottles function much like funnels. “Funnel” standards—Describing Archives: a Content Standard (DACS), Anglo-American Cataloging Rules Revised 2nd edition (AACR2), and Cataloging Cultural Objects (CCO)—are called data content standards and they provide instructions for inputting consistent metadata into “bottle” standards.

While Elings and Waibel don’t discuss the interfaces for cataloging and discovery in their article, I’ve taken the liberty of extending their metadata standards metaphor to include examples of tools for packaging and distributing bottles to consumers.

Brick factory in Gerona, Catalonia, Spain
The factory Brillas & Pagans (Celrà) by Bernat Caseroa (Flickr)

Beverages don’t bottle themselves. Bottling factories utilize machinery and people power to create, bottle, and package drinks for distribution. In this metaphor, the factory is the tool in which an archivist or cataloger does her work. An example of a tool that is currently under development is ArchivesSpace, an open source tool for creating and editing archival description. Currently, archival description work is done in an Oxygen XML Editor. Metadata “factories” are often generically referred to as integrated library sytems (ILS) and content management systems (CMS).

No factory manager wants consumers wandering onto the factory floor for liquid sustenance. The product, whether drinks or metadata, must be sent to a market for use.

In a market, consumers can search and browse for resources. At Indiana University, the archives resources “market,” Archives Online at Indiana University,2 is powered by two open source platforms: XTF3 and METS Navigator.4 A new market tool is also very near completion: ArchivesSpace will function not only as a staff interface (bottling factory) but as a public interface component (market) as well.5 These metaphorical markets are often referred to as discovery layers–an end-user-friendly platform that sits on top of the data.

Here are the standards and tools charted out:

Archival materials Bibliographic materials
Data structure standards Bottles
  • EAD
  • EAC-CPF
  • MARC21 Bibliographic
  • MARC21 Authority
Data content standards Funnels
  • DACS
  • DACS 2nd ed.*
  • AACR2
  • RDA
Data curation tools Bottling factory
  • Archon
  • Archivists Toolkit
  • ArchivesSpace staff interface*
  • SirsiDynix Worfklows
  • Kuali OLE
Resource discovery layers Market
  • XTF
  • METS Navigator
  • ArchivesSpace public interface*
  • Blacklight

* DACS 2nd ed. and ArchivesSpace are both due to be released in late summer 2013.

Elings and Waibel argue that metadata standards grew up to be format-centric, not institution/community-specific. In other words, the EAD and DACS standards that are used to describe archival materials can be used in an archive, a library, or a museum.

Do you use archival metadata standards in your shop?


  1. Elings, M.W. & Waibel, G. (2007). Metadata for all: Descriptive standards and metadata sharing across libraries, archives and museums. First Monday, 12(3). Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/article/view/1628/1543
  2. Archives Online at Indiana University. Retrieved from http://webapp1.dlib.indiana.edu/findingaids/
  3. California Digital Library. XTF. Retrieved from http://xtf.cdlib.org/
  4. Indiana University Digital Library Program. METS Navigator. Retrieved from http://metsnavigator.sourceforge.net/
  5. Prom, C. (2011 September 27). Interface Design Principles: ArchivesSpace. Retrieved from http://www.archivesspace.org/documents/specifications/interface-design-principles/
Posted on March 4, 2013 by Author Jennifer A. Liss Posted in Categories Resources | Tagged: Tags archives metadata, DACS, EAC-CPF, EAD

Next Meeting

Stay tuned for future dates. Join our listserv to keep in touch.

Tag Soup

3D archives metadata BIBFRAME controlled vocabularies DACS DataCite data quality digitization projects discovery tools Dublin Core EAC-CPF EAD finding aids FRBR fun and games guest blog inclusive metadata legacy data library data linked data MARC21 metadata tools microdata minimum metadata requirements MODS name authorities NISO OCLC open bibliographic data RDA RDF schema.org scientific data search engines shareable metadata special collections metadata standards bias structural metadata user-contributed metadata VIAF W3C webinars web metadata Wikipedia XML

Indiana University

Accessibility | Privacy Notice | Copyright © The Trustees of Indiana University